Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

Citation

  • Authors: Papaioannou, I., Disterer, P., Owen, J. S.
  • Year: 2009
  • Journal: J Gene Med 11 267-74
  • Applications: in vitro / siRNA / INTERFERin
  • Cell type: CHO
    Description: Chinese hamster ovary cells

Method

9 nM siRNA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gene editing is potentially a powerful technology for introducing genetic changes by using short single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides (ssODNs). However, their efficiency is reduced by the mismatch repair system, especially MSH2, which may suppress gene editing, although findings vary depending on readout and type of oligonucleotide used. Additionally, successfully edited cells are reported to arrest at the S- or G2-phase. In the present study, we evaluate whether a novel ssODN design and down-regulation of MSH2 expression allows the isolation of replicating gene-edited cells. METHODS: Cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing mutated enhanced green fluorescent protein were targeted with ssODNs of varying design, all capable of restoring fluorescence, which allows the monitoring of correction events by flow cytometry. Converted cells were isolated by cell sorting and grown to determine colony formation efficiencies. MSH2 expression was suppressed with small interfering RNA and the cell cycle distribution of cells transfected with ssODN was quantified by flow cytometry, following propidium iodide or DRAQ5 staining. RESULTS: Although efficiency was higher using ssODN end-protected with phosphorothioate, the potential of edited cells to form colonies was lower than those targeted with unmodified ssODN. We established that ssODN transfection itself perturbs the cell cycle and that MSH2 gene silencing increases correction efficiency. In both cases, however, the effect was dependent on the positioning of the protected nucleotides. Importantly, when internally protected ssODN was used in combination with MSH2 suppression, a higher proportion of G1-phase corrected cells was observed 48-64 h after transfection. CONCLUSIONS: Use of internally protected ssODN and downregulating cellular MSH2 activity may facilitate isolation of viable, actively replicating gene-edited cells.

Go to