Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

Citation

  • Authors: Rodriguez, L., Villalobos, X., Dakhel, S., Padilla, L., Hervas, R., Hernandez, J. L., Ciudad, C. J., Noe, V.
  • Year: 2013
  • Journal: Biochem Pharmacol 86 1541-54
  • Applications: in vivo / modified DNA, PPRHs / in vivo-jetPEI

Method

10 µg or 50 µg of PPRH (non-modified DNA molecules formed by two antiparallel polypurine stretches linked by a five-thymidine loop. They interfere with the transcription process, thus decreasing mRNA and protein levels of the target gene) were complexed with in vivo-jetPEI with a N/P ratio of 8 and injected intratumorally or intravenously, respectively. Intratumoral injections were performed in a volume of 20 µl and intravenous injections were performed in a volume of 200 µl. Injections were performed twice a week for 3 weeks and tumor growth was assessed during the course of the treatment.

Abstract

As a new approach for gene therapy, we recently developed a new type of molecule called polypurine reverse Hoogsteen hairpins (PPRHs). We decided to explore the in vitro and in vivo effect of PPRHs in cancer choosing survivin as a target since it is involved in apoptosis, mitosis and angiogenesis, and overexpressed in different tumors. We designed four PPRHs against the survivin gene, one of them directed against the template strand and three against different regions of the coding strand. These PPRHs were tested in PC3 prostate cancer cells in an in vitro screening of cell viability and apoptosis. PPRHs against the promoter sequence were the most effective and caused a decrease in survivin mRNA and protein levels. We confirmed the binding between the selected PPRHs and their target sequences in the survivin gene. In addition we determined that both the template- and the coding-PPRH targeting the survivin promoter were interfering with the binding of transcription factors Sp1 and GATA-3, respectively. Finally, we conducted two in vivo efficacy assays using the Coding-PPRH against the survivin promoter and performing two routes of administration, namely intratumoral and intravenous, in a subcutaneous xenograft tumor model of PC3 prostate cancer cells. The results showed that the chosen Coding-PPRH proved to be effective in decreasing tumor volume, and reduced the levels of survivin protein and the formation of blood vessels. These findings represent the preclinical proof of principle of PPRHs as a new silencing tool for cancer gene therapy.

Go to